Rick Ramsey fetched himself a new Yamaha WR250R from the Gunnison, Colorado, dealer today. His Yamaha WR section is relatively new, but knowing his passion for tinkering, you can bet it'll be full of useful info in no time flat!
Rick's site: HERE
Saturday, August 8, 2009
Wednesday, August 5, 2009
Yamaha WR lowering WR250X

Question about Yamaha WR lowering on Supermotojunkie.com as related to raising the forks on the WR250X.
"10mm is the most popular starting point to raise the forks in the triple clamps; the most you can move the forks SAFELY on this bike is 18mm. There is no 1:1 ratio of fork/rear end lowering because changes to rake/trail (the fork) affect geometry at a different rate than changes to the rear.
Extensive testing showed us that 2 inches (just a hair under, really) is the most you can lower the rear of the R and X while still maintaining a "balanced" ride up front. Anything more than 2 inches total in rear and the forks cannot safely be raised to give a ride capable of withstanding race-type speeds and handling. This is not to say a very very short leisurely rider could not get away with more lowering.
Depending on rider preference you just slide the forks up or down a few millimeters. As you may or may not know, 6mm is approximately 1/4 inch. But 10mm is a great starting point. Too much and the bike headshakes and oversteers. Not enough and it turns like a NHRA dragster and understeers. Thankfully it takes just a few bolts to make the fork height changes; please retorque the clamp bolts correctly.
As someone else noted, 1/3 of total travel is used for sag, give or take a few millimeter. The "give or take" is, again, based on personal preference.
And as the installation instructions note, make sure your chain is properly tightened (approximately 45-50mm of slack measured at the middle/bottom of the chain when the bike is off the stand....someone please correct me if I'm a bit off on this comment)."
Sunday, August 2, 2009
WR lowering: sag
Yamaha WR lowering post of the day: how to set sag.
Seems to be a very popular question. The most important part of any suspension yet so many don't do it.
Click HERE.
Seems to be a very popular question. The most important part of any suspension yet so many don't do it.
Click HERE.
Thursday, July 2, 2009
WR lowering post of the day

WR lowering post of the day in regard to the misconception that lowering links decrease travel.
All the bikes I have seen with stock links that have a rubber mark on the rear fender have been bottomed hard and are a long way into the neoprene shock stop. Mfg's advertise the total travel assuming the shock stop is not on the shock shaft, so to get the rubber marks on the rear fender that stop has to be compressed pretty hard, also you have to consider the sub frame and fender flex. The way to measure usable travel is remove the rear shock spring, cycle the swing arm thru its arc until the weight of the bike is lifted with the shock stop. That travel measured will be about 30% less than the advertised travel. Longer links increase the leverage ratio slightly so that in turn increases both the total and usable travel. They also allow the tire to hit the fender sooner and harder as the stop does not have to be compressed as far. I would not say that a bike is under sprung from the factory because the tire is hittng the fender, first compare the race sag and the free sag to figure the correct spring rate.
Sunday, June 21, 2009
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
